And oversight so far has been weak. On or about January 11, 2022, Jimenez-Lobaina, 29, of Tulsa, intentionally possessed with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. But as of mid-March, neither state had received federal requests for their share. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS They are charged with possessing firearms in furtherance of their drug trafficking crimes, and finally, Daniel Burns is charged with being a felon in possession of a Glock .45 caliber lever-action rifle; an FN 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Smith & Wesson .45 caliber semiautomatic pistol; a Sig Sauer 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a PWS .223 caliber rifle; a CZ 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Radikal, 12 gauge semiautomatic shotgun; an Anderson Manufacturing multi-caliber rifle; a DPMS .223/5.56 caliber rifle; a Glock 9X19 semiautomatic pistol; a Marlin, .270 Win rifle; a Canick 9X19 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Taurus 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; and a Sig Sauer 9 mm semiautomatic pistol. Robert Perrys crimes are despicable. The defendant preyed on an innocent child solely for his own pleasure, without regard to the grievous and long-lasting harm his depraved conduct would cause, the special agent in charge of the FBIs Oklahoma City Field Office, Edward Gray, said. Check with the OK - OKLAHOMA CITY location, if you'd like to look at 2022 CHEVROLET SILVERADO for yourself. Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced-November 2022 19 Indicted in Eastern Oklahoma on Federal Charges for Methamphetamine 2022 CHEVROLET SILVERADO K2500 CUSTOM for Sale | OK - OKLAHOMA CITY Casseus has since been indicted on two federal drug charges stemming from the selling of fentanyl-laced cocaine to the Spring Breakers on March 10 and the selling of cocaine to an undercover . It is a tribute to some of the people who have died in the country's ongoing opioid epidemic. Below are all criminal cases in Western District of Oklahoma, for 2022, with case numbers 2022-cr-00000 through 2022-cr-00499. As such, under the Bureau of Prisons guidelines, the convict is eligible to serve out his sentence in a federal prison for women. Updated: Jan 14, 2022 / . Assistant U.S. Attorney Justin G. Bish is prosecuting the case. Alternatively, it could attach conditions to the more than $6 billion in federal grants that goes to states each year to address addiction. Only the federal government or tribes have jurisdiction to prosecute cases that occur in Indian Country that involve Native American defendants. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Public policy and health experts say a vacuum of federal leadership could lead to serious wasted opportunities and missteps in the use of the billions that will be paid out over nearly two decades in what could be an unfortunate reprise of the multibillion-dollar 1998 settlement with tobacco companies. Court: Tenth Circuit Oklahoma US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Type: Prisoner Petitions Habeas Corpus (General) Private Jets Inc v. QBE Insurance Corporation Filed: April 25, 2023 as 5:2023cv00342 Plaintiff: Private Jets Inc Defendant: QBE Insurance Corporation He is further charged with sexual contact against the same minor. 22-CR-378, Brian Keith Doty. 22-CR-376, Jared Nathan Black. Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced- February 2022 Jan 14, 2022 / 04:41 PM CST. "States get wide eyes when they get these huge pots of money," says Bill Pierce, who served as spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services in the early 2000s. Royce was previously convicted of six felonies, including three crimes of violence. Northern District of Oklahoma He is further charged aiding and abetting another individual with using and maintaining a place in Broken Arrow for the purpose of distributing an illicit drug. "If they want, they could try and tie that money to requirements that settlement money be spent on opioids.". Opioid settlement billions flow to states, as advocates worry about Today, less than 3% of the annual payouts support anti-smoking programs. The Office of National Drug Control Policy declined to comment, given ongoing litigation in a related case in Philadelphia. Press Releases FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation Unlawful Reentry of a Removed Alien. No Thanks O'Donnell, a Catoosa Republican, was indicted in December 2021 on five felony counts and three misdemeanors while his wife, Teresa O'Donnell, was charged with three felonies and one misdemeanor. 22-CR-192, Christopher Scott Royce. A locked padlock Used & Repairable Salvage 2022 CHEVROLET SILVERADO K2500 CUSTOM for sale in OK - OKLAHOMA CITY on Tue. Kathy Hochul rejected a recommendation to use opioid settlement funds to support two overdose prevention centers places where people can use illicit drugs under supervision. That's why the administration helped create a model law, as "a blueprint for states and communities on evidence-based ways to use opioid settlement funds," he said. KFF Health News is following how state and local governments use or misuse the cash through this year. Suite 300 Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced- June 2022 A similar conversation is taking place in San Francisco, with the mayor citing a lack of federal legal clarity on the issue. An official website of the United States government. For instance, the money could support grassroots organizations that don't have the time or ability to apply for federal grants, she said. TULSA, Okla. A Claremore man found with more than 500 images of child sexual abuse material on his electronic devices pleaded guilty Tuesday in federal court, announced U.S. Attorney TULSA, Okla. A Depew man who used Snapchat to coerce and entice a minor to commit sexual acts was convicted Thursday in federal court, announced U.S. Attorney Clint Johnson. Myers and other advocates asked legislators to do so only if they required states to spend at least 25% of the funds on anti-smoking efforts. A lock ( Perry was previously convicted in Tulsa County District Court in 2020, but the conviction was later dismissed after the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that the state lacked jurisdiction to prosecute the case. The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt to overcome a defendants presumption of innocence. A subsequent press release by the department, issued in late February when he was sentenced, replaced the word man with Tulsan and notes at the bottom, The defendant, Robert Perry II, now identifies as she/her.. Two of the nineteen defendants indicted are also charged with federal firearm offenses carrying punishment of not more than 10 years imprisonment, and up to a $250,000 fine or both. The Drug Enforcement Administration and Tulsa Police Department are the investigative agencies. But Congress waived its right to the money unconditionally. Federal charges for Drug Conspiracy is punishable by not less than 10 years imprisonment, and up to a $10,000,000 fine or both. Given the energy crisis at the time, the administration wanted states to reduce oil consumption by imposing a maximum speed limit of 55 mph. Oklahoma AG to drop charges against GOP Rep. and his wife The companies paying out the money are responsible for holding states to that threshold, but they're unlikely to monitor closely, legal experts say. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. ", The Office of National Drug Control Policy told KFF Health News it regularly discusses the use of settlement dollars with governors, mayors, and other elected officials to ensure the money bolsters federal efforts already underway. For example, in New York, Democratic Gov. At least 85% of the money states receive must be spent on opioid-related expenses. This week, the Court made it clear that Perrys predatory crimes and blame shifting warranted a lifetime in federal prison., In his sentencing guidelines, the judge recommended that Perry be remanded to a medium security prison or a facility that will allow him the opportunity in the most comprehensive mental health and gender-care treatment programs., A press release issued in May 2022 by the Department of Justice when Perry was convicted of the charges against him refers to him as a man and makes no mention of his transexual identity. But it couldn't mandate states to do so. Assault with Intent to Commit Murder in Indian Country; Carrying, Using, and Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence; Assault with a Dangerous Weapon with Intent to do Bodily Harm in Indian Country. Federal authorities haven't acted to shut down any sites so far but haven't publicly supported them either. But interpretations of qualifying expenses vary widely often based on state politics. The policy was a reversal of Trump-era rules that required inmates to be housed in units based solely on their biological sex. Some states, like Arkansas and Oregon, have planned for similar possibilities in their public documents about the opioid settlements. In such turf disputes, the lack of federal leadership is acutely felt, say some advocates. The federal government also can suggest the settlements be used to augment, not duplicate, existing federal funding, said Gilbert, of the Bipartisan Policy Center. Official websites use .gov hide caption. Since Medicaid is jointly funded by the U.S. and state governments, federal authorities had a right to some of the settlement money. FBI Oklahoma City 2022 Operational Successes 12.06.2022. Instead, Nixon signed a law saying states could receive federal highway funding only if they lowered speed limits. Finally, he is charged with incest. They are further charged with aiding and abetting each other to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and to possess with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl. The gun malfunctioned and did not fire. Alex Wong/Getty Images The FBI, Rogers County Sheriffs Office and Mayes County Sheriffs Office are the investigative agencies. PDF Federal Supports for Afterschool and Summer Child Care Oklahoma Oklahoma Pedophile Changes Pronouns to 'She/Her' After Receiving Life ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. USA v. And there is time to build on that, since the opioid settlements will be stretched out over many years, she added. Doty, 30, of Dewey, is charged with engaging in and attempting to engage in sexual acts with a child between 12 and 16 years of age from Nov. 1, 2014, to Aug. 29, 2016. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. After all, states filed the lawsuits against companies that made, sold, or distributed opioid painkillers, including Johnson & Johnson, McKesson, and Walmart. Accused dealer of fentanyl-laced cocaine in Spring Break overdoses But today, as billions of dollars actually start to flow and state and local leaders make crucial decisions on how to spend the more than $50 billion windfall to tackle this entrenched public health crisis, the federal government has gone mostly quiet. But it has stopped short of explicitly recommending settlement funds for this purpose. Fax: (918) 560-7938. A lock () or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. She cited "various state and federal laws" that make such sites illegal. The FBI and Jenks Police Department are the investigative agencies. Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas E. Buscemi is prosecuting the case. States filed lawsuits against corporations involved in the opioid crisis. According to Phil Bacharach, spokesperson for the Oklahoma attorney general's office, the state eventually reached an agreement to keep all its Purdue settlement but later pay $390,000 to the . In 2015, shortly after intravenous drug use sparked a major HIV outbreak in Scott County, Indiana, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study showing other counties were similarly vulnerable. Criminal Cases in Western District of Oklahoma, 2022, case numbers 2022-cr-00000 through 2022-cr-00499. 110 W. 7th Street Kentucky, identified as a hot spot, went on to implement policies that dramatically increased the number of syringe service programs, which are known to reduce HIV transmission. Let it be known that the FBI and our law enforcement partners will not tolerate crimes against children, and as evidenced by todays verdict, neither will the community., Nine months later, U.S. District Judge Jack Zouhary sentenced the 32-year-old Perry to life in federal prison. The abuse took place between May 2017 and May 2018, according to prosecutors. Such initiatives are designed to minimize the risks of using drugs but are politically fraught, with critics saying they encourage illegal activity and supporters saying they save lives. The two are also charged with aiding and abetting each other on Oct. 21, 2022, to manufacture 500 grams or more of methamphetamine. Federal Grand Jury B Indictments Announced-November 2022 Subscribe They are also charged with aiding and abetting each other to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute cocaine. United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the November 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. Federal Criminal Cases, Western District of Oklahoma, 2022, 2022-cr TULSA, Okla. United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the November 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. But history suggests optional federal guidance may not be enough to ensure the money is used for its intended purpose. Those lawsuits aimed, in part, to recover health care costs for smoking-related illnesses. Sexual Abuse of a Minor in Indian Country(Counts 1-3); Coercion and Enticement of a Minor in Indian Country (Counts 4-5); Sexual Abuse of an Incapable Victim in Indian Country (Count 6); Aggravated Sexual Abuse by Force in Indian Country (Count 7) (superseding). It is a tribute to some of the people who have died in the country's ongoing opioid epidemic. 22-CR-163. The federal government can emphasize the more flexible options for spending the settlement money compared with federal funds, Gilbert said. Get FBI email alerts The federal government is not legally obligated to engage in the discussion. An activist group that seeks to prevent the housing of men who identify as women in female-only prisons, Keep Prisons Single Sex USA, says there are more than 1,500 federal inmates who identify as transgender in the United States, nearly half of whom are in prison for sex-related crimes. Today, the Biden administration could provide data to similarly inform local decisions, LaBelle says. . Black, 46, of Jenks, is charged with pointing a firearm at the victims head and pulling the trigger with intent to commit murder after the victim intervened in a domestic assault on Dec. 26, 2020. He is further charged with coercing and enticing two of the victims to engage in sexual activity. Baltimore Eight Tray Gangster Crips Member Sentenced to Almost 20 Years in Federal Prison for Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Charges April 5, 2023 Read More Press Release West Hartford Man. McCurtain County Resident Pleads Guilty to Child Abuse in Indian Country . "It was a significant missed opportunity," Myers says, "because it meant the federal government ended up having no say whatsoever in how the dollars were used. No federal employee holds the title of opioid crisis accountability coordinator. 22-CR-374, Jacob William Fairchild. Back then, tobacco companies agreed to pay states billions annually for as long as they continued selling cigarettes. During the 2020 campaign, Biden had laid out a plan to appoint an "opioid crisis accountability coordinator" to support states in their lawsuits against companies accused of sparking the overdose epidemic. Myers, of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, put it this way: "States will only listen to the federal government if there's a financial reason to do so.". Assistant U.S. Attorney Ben Tonkin is prosecuting the case. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. But there were no restrictions on the money's use and much of it went to plugging state budget gaps, filling potholes, and even subsidizing tobacco farmers. Beating the opioid epidemic by disrupting drug trafficking and expanding access to treatment is one of the four pillars of Biden's "unity agenda.". A national dashboard launched late last year to show nonfatal overdoses is a start. The following individuals have been charged with violations of United States law in indictments returned by the Grand Jury. USA v. Adams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00411-119481), USA v. Aguilar-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00163-117614), USA v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00133-117588), USA v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00133-117590), USA v. Ali et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117383), USA v. Ali et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117384), USA v. Allen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00084-117056), USA v. Alvarado-Romero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00182-117703), USA v. Andrews, Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00431-119667), USA v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00239-118349), USA v. Arterberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00338-119002), USA v. Arterberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00338-119003), USA v. Ashley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00494-120095), USA v. Ballard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00184-117734), USA v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-cr-00271-118515), USA v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-cr-00271-118514), USA v. Bass (okwd-5:2022-cr-00111-117421), USA v. Batista et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119331), USA v. Batista et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119332), USA v. Been (okwd-5:2022-cr-00268-118500), USA v. Bellamy, Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00350-119021), USA v. Benson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00143-117543), USA v. Berry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00248-118365), USA v. Black (okwd-5:2022-cr-00287-118688), USA v. Boone (okwd-5:2022-cr-00276-118523), USA v. Booth (okwd-5:2022-cr-00124-117357), USA v. Bowman (okwd-5:2022-cr-00349-119036), USA v. Britton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00343-119014), USA v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00473-119943), USA v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00265-118496), USA v. Bunch et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00183-117709), USA v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00204-117965), USA v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00169-117718), USA v. Butterfield (okwd-5:2022-cr-00407-119461), USA v. Cade (okwd-5:2022-cr-00202-117950), USA v. Ceballos-Grado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00372-119297), USA v. Chen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00305-118802), USA v. Chill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00160-117537), USA v. Colbert (okwd-5:2022-cr-00201-117935), USA v. Colbert (okwd-5:2022-cr-00201-117936), USA v. Collins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00386-119321), USA v. Collins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00386-119322), USA v. Crary (okwd-5:2022-cr-00158-117558), USA v. Crary (okwd-5:2022-cr-00158-117559), USA v. Daniel (okwd-5:2022-cr-00229-118163), USA v. Dominguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00342-119010), USA v. Douangpanya et al. In 2019, O'Donnell introduced a bill that removed a prohibition from state law that said spouses of legislators couldn't serve as tag agents. FBI.gov is an official site of the U.S. Department of Justice. Finally, he is charged with possessing child sexual abuse material. The United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Oklahoma announced the federal grand jury sitting in Muskogee completed a four-day session last Friday and returned 90 felony. Royce, 43, of Broken Arrow, is charged with being a felon in possession of a Marlin, 30/30 caliber lever-action rifle; a Mauser bolt-action rifle; an Iver Johnson .22 caliber bolt-action rifle; a Ruger .22 caliber revolver; a Ruger .380 caliber semi-automatic pistol; a Taurus .22 caliber pistol and 22 rounds of ammunition. The opioid settlements have a built-in protection to address this concern. The agency has tried to recoup costs in at least one case. "There are opportunities to incentivize" and support state and local governments "in the right direction," says Michele Gilbert, a senior policy analyst with the think tank Bipartisan Policy Center. Black is further charged with discharging the firearm during a crime of violence. News FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation Bruce Alexander, spokesperson for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, declined to answer specific questions and simply wrote, "CMS is currently reviewing the issue.". The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond . "We have an opportunity to see what's the appropriate role of the federal government," LaBelle says. Some people question whether the Biden administration's weighing in would have much impact, given the deep political divisions in some states where local officials are eager to flout federal guidance. (okwd-5:2022-cr-00058-116810), USA v. Duncan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00330-118988), USA v. Duncan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00330-118989), USA v. Dyer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117963), USA v. Dyer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117964), USA v. Evans (okwd-5:2022-cr-00219-118189), USA v. Fields (okwd-5:2022-cr-00442-119779), USA v. Figueroa-Cifuentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00401-119493), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119344), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119343), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119345), USA v. Fransen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00232-118175), USA v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00093-117121), USA v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00093-117122), USA v. Garcia-Quevedo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00125-117399), USA v. Griffitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00250-118372), USA v. Hall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00444-119786), USA v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00317-118826), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00230-118192), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00114-117404), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00230-118191), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00328-118991), USA v. Hawkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00347-119024), USA v. Henderson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00078-116963), USA v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00251-118353), USA v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00077-116964), USA v. Hinojosa Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120093), USA v. Hinojosa Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120092), USA v. Hinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00326-118972), USA v. Hocker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00424-119660), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117925), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117926), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117924), USA v. House (okwd-5:2022-cr-00174-117723), USA v. Hugar (okwd-5:2022-cr-00092-117131), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00059-116807), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00378-119307), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00429-119680), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00059-116806), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00429-119681), USA v. Jacobs (okwd-5:2022-cr-00210-117967), USA v. James (okwd-5:2022-cr-00154-117586), USA v. James (okwd-5:2022-cr-00154-117587), USA v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00369-119318), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00345-119018), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00376-119305), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00039-116619), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00193-117929), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00178-117720), USA v. Jordan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00339-119006), USA v. Jordan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00339-119007), USA v. Kays (okwd-5:2022-cr-00040-116627), USA v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00159-117574), USA v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00395-119451), USA v. Killian et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00025-116486), USA v. King (okwd-5:2022-cr-00488-120116), USA v. Lack (okwd-5:2022-cr-00336-118997), USA v. Lacy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00277-118521), USA v. Lalehparvaran (okwd-5:2022-cr-00319-118800), USA v. Landers (okwd-5:2022-cr-00434-119684), USA v. Lara (okwd-5:2022-cr-00464-119934), USA v. Liles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00216-118212), USA v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00256-118356), USA v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00024-116483), USA v. Luo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00449-119825), USA v. Lynch (okwd-5:2022-cr-00298-118668), USA v. Madala (okwd-5:2022-cr-00150-117583), USA v. Madison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00432-119676), USA v. Mahan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00191-117934), USA v. Manzano (okwd-5:2022-cr-00176-117714), USA v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00495-120106), USA v. Martin, et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00094-117125), USA v. Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00300-118672), USA v. Martinez-Gallardo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00462-119946), USA v. Mazariegos-Mencia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00303-118803), USA v. McCane (okwd-5:2022-cr-00213-117923), USA v. McCollum (okwd-5:2022-cr-00211-117918), USA v. McGee (okwd-5:2022-cr-00023-116480), USA v. McGinley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00122-117395), USA v. McKane (okwd-5:2022-cr-00213-117922), USA v. McKenzie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00454-119792), USA v. Medina-Gil (okwd-5:2022-cr-00487-120102), USA v. Mendez-Vasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00181-117736), USA v. Montijo-Varela et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00465-119952), USA v. Monts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00329-118980), USA v. Moreno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00306-118805), USA v. Moreno et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00404-119470), USA v. Moseley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00241-118341), USA v. Muhammad (okwd-5:2022-cr-00430-119665), USA v. Muhammad (okwd-5:2022-cr-00430-119666), USA v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00195-117945), USA v. Nava et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00221-118214), USA v. Nguyen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00380-119296), USA v. Nguyen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00380-119294), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116984), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116982), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116983), USA v. Ochoa-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00472-119928), USA v. Olguin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00294-118691), USA v. Outland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00385-119324), USA v. Padilla-Chairez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00289-118685), USA v. Parks (okwd-5:2022-cr-00297-118682), USA v. Parrish (okwd-5:2022-cr-00318-118828), USA v. Peevy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00493-120111), USA v. Plummer et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00348), USA v. Poafpybitty (okwd-5:2022-cr-00222-118187), USA v. Pohawpatchoko (okwd-5:2022-cr-00206-117920), USA v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00164-117619), USA v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00155-117547), USA v. Prado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00299-118678), USA v. Prince (okwd-5:2022-cr-00157-117595), USA v. Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00161-117560), USA v. Ramos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00180-117716), USA v. Ramos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00180-117717), USA v. Ricketts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00168-117733), USA v. Ricketts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00168-117732), USA v. Rivera et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00152-117556), USA v. Rodriguez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00422-119662), USA v. Rodriguez-Cordova (okwd-5:2022-cr-00471-119926), USA v. Rodriguez-Cordova (okwd-5:2022-cr-00471-119925), USA v. Rodriguez-Garcia et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00455-119814), USA v. Rodriguez-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00313-118798), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120078), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120079), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120081), USA v. Romero-Arredondo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00362-119282), USA v. Royal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00060-116813), USA v. Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00433-119671), USA v. Salaices (okwd-5:2022-cr-00461-119958), USA v. Saldivar (okwd-5:2022-cr-00451-119775), USA v. Sandoval (okwd-5:2022-cr-00235-118207), USA v. Santiago (okwd-5:2022-cr-00253-118388), USA v. Santizo-Roblero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00148-117576), USA v. Schenck (okwd-5:2022-cr-00373-119288), USA v. Schenck (okwd-5:2022-cr-00373-119289), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00095-117128), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00351-119026), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00205-117927), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00477-119949), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00275-118503), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00340-119008), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00212-117914), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00074-116952), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00427-119673), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00207-117959), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00208-117946), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00076-116946), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00156-117549), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00258-118392), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00453-119823), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00296-118666), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119330), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00476-119937), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00311-118817), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00024-116482), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00406-119456), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00057-116804), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00295-118680), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00078-116962), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117962), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00152-117554), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00326-118971), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00318-118827), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00319-118799), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00371-119271), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00408-119494), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00231-118161), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00316-118819), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00344-119022), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00379-119290), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00126-117353), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00341-119004), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00407-119460), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00495-120105), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00277-118520), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00317-118825), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00257-118377), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00350-119020), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117382), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00455-119804), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00346-119012), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00084-117055), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00274-118516), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00233-118195), USA v. Simental (okwd-5:2022-cr-00177-117727), USA v. Simental (okwd-5:2022-cr-00177-117726), USA v. Simmons (okwd-5:2022-cr-00255-118345), USA v. Simms (okwd-5:2022-cr-00153-117571), USA v. Simms (okwd-5:2022-cr-00153-117570), USA v. Singer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00309-118809), USA v. Singer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00309-118810), USA v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00272-118506), USA v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00038-116625), USA v. Solis-Mancilla (okwd-5:2022-cr-00280-118527), USA v. Soutter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00390-119327), USA v. Stanley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00075-116951), USA v. Stanley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00075-116950), USA v. Taber (okwd-5:2022-cr-00252-118362), USA v. Tahmasebi (okwd-5:2022-cr-00037-116639), USA v. Tevalan-Ajanel (okwd-5:2022-cr-00172-117741), USA v. Thomas Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00410-119477), USA v. Thompson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00120-117415), USA v. To et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00450-119789), USA v. Torralba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00278-118519), USA v. Torralba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00278-118518), USA v. Urias et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00190-117939), USA v. Wang (okwd-5:2022-cr-00240-118369), USA v. Wang (okwd-5:2022-cr-00240-118370), USA v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00475-119940), USA v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00475-119939), USA v. Warren et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00123-117407), USA v. Warren et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00123-117411), USA v. Washington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00446-119788), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00325-118982), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00428-119670), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00466-119961), USA v. Welge (okwd-5:2022-cr-00365-119286), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00121-117389), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00179-117728), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00179-117729), USA v. Wilkinson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00200-117952), USA v. Wood (okwd-5:2022-cr-00463-119945), USA v. Woodfork (okwd-5:2022-cr-00467-119962), USA v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00341-119005), USA v. Yates (okwd-5:2022-cr-00377-119314), USA v. Yates (okwd-5:2022-cr-00377-119313), USA v.Woodley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00348-119016), USA v.Woodley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00348-119017), United States of America v. Aguilar-Morales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00263), United States of America v. Aguilar-Torres (okwd-5:2022-mj-00031), United States of America v. Aguilar-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00334-118994), United States of America v. Aguilera-Nunez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00398-119458), United States of America v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00211), United States of America v. Alston (okwd-5:2022-mj-00036), United States of America v. Alvarado-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00034-116624), United States of America v. Alvarado-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00034-116623), United States of America v. Alvarez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00292-118686), United States of America v. Alvarez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00482), United States of America v. Anderson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00142-117578), United States of America v. Anglin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00393-119466), United States of America v. Anguiano-Moncivais (okwd-5:2022-cr-00333-118998), United States of America v. Antoine (okwd-5:2022-mj-00236), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119817), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119820), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119819), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119818), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119816), United States of America v. Arnett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00491-120113), United States of America v. Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00087-117116), United States of America v. Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00087-117117), United States of America v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00239-118347), United States of America v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00400), United States of America v. Austin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00096), United States of America v. Avilla-Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00110), United States of America v. Bacca (okwd-5:2022-mj-00123), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116348), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116359), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116362), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116355), United States of America v. Bailey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00420), United States of America v. Barcenas-Velasquez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00030), United States of America v. Barcenas-Velasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00061-116746), United States of America v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-mj-00396), United States of America v. Barrios (okwd-5:2022-cr-00312-118821), United States of America v. Barron-Orquiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00364-119275), United States of America v. Battiest (okwd-5:2022-cr-00261-118409), United States of America v. Bedwell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00353), United States of America v. Been (okwd-5:2022-cr-00268-118499), United States of America v. Bell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00266-118497), United States of America v. Benavidez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00478), United States of America v. Benfall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00417-119682), United States of America v. Bennett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00263-118475), United States of America v. Benson et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00252), United States of America v. Bernabe-Chagollan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00259-118331), United States of America v. Bernabe-Chagollan (okwd-5:2022-mj-00135), United States of America v. Berry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00248-118364), United States of America v. Biggs (okwd-5:2022-cr-00030-116614), United States of America v. Biggs (okwd-5:2022-mj-00052), United States of America v. Bishop (okwd-5:2022-cr-00416-119635), United States of America v. Black (okwd-5:2022-mj-00484), United States of America v. Bliffin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00024), United States of America v. Blitch (okwd-5:2022-cr-00414-119592), United States of America v. Blodgett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00063-116931), United States of America v. Blodgett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00062-116929), United States of America v. Bomgren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00194-117916), United States of America v. Bomgren (okwd-5:2022-mj-00275), United States of America v. Bond (okwd-5:2022-cr-00264-118509), United States of America v. Bourdeau (okwd-5:2022-mj-00235), United States of America v. Bralley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00355-119033), United States of America v. Brand (okwd-5:2022-cr-00002-116330), United States of America v. Brand (okwd-5:2022-cr-00002-116331), United States of America v. Breese et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00068-116959), United States of America v. Breese et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00086), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-mj-00051), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-cr-00496-120171), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-cr-00097-117186), United States of America v. Buckaloo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00011-116510), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00265-118495), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00473-119942), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00446), United States of America v. Bulock (okwd-5:2022-cr-00426-119663), United States of America v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00301), United States of America v. Campbell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00138-117601), United States of America v. Cantu (okwd-5:2022-cr-00117-117363), United States of America v. Cantwell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00035), United States of America v. Carbajal-Badillo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00445-119794), United States of America v. Cardenas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00391-119268), United States of America v. Casasnovas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00198-117948), United States of America v. Casasnovas et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00233), United States of America v. Castro (okwd-5:2022-mj-00064), United States of America v. Chavez-Gomez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00082-117064), United States of America v. Chen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00305-118801), United States of America v. Church (okwd-5:2022-mj-00164), United States of America v. Clague (okwd-5:2022-mj-00087), United States of America v. Clayton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00047-116862), United States of America v. Clemente-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00146-117580), United States of America v. Clemente-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00256), United States of America v. Coleman et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00035-116629), United States of America v. Cook (okwd-5:2022-cr-00361-119252), United States of America v. Cooke (okwd-5:2022-cr-00457-119921), United States of America v. Cooper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00301-118712), United States of America v. Cox (okwd-5:2022-cr-00284-118664), United States of America v. Cox (okwd-5:2022-mj-00474), United States of America v. Crawford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00303), United States of America v. Cruz-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00225-118159), United States of America v. Dalton et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00001-116334), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00025), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00478-119965), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00358-119141), United States of America v. Dawson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00465), United States of America v. Day (okwd-5:2022-cr-00412-119542), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117113), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117114), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117115), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00383), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00386), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00260-118333), United States of America v. Deyo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00413-119583), United States of America v. Diaz-Bustamante (okwd-5:2022-cr-00485-120097), United States of America v. Donaldson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00059), United States of America v. Dooley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00360-119209), United States of America v. Downes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00187-117796), United States of America v. Downes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00188-117798), United States of America v. Dyson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00227), United States of America v. Dyson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00112-117427), United States of America v. Earnest (okwd-5:2022-mj-00165), United States of America v. Easton (okwd-5:2022-mj-00395), United States of America v. Edmond (okwd-5:2022-mj-00186), United States of America v. Espinoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00167-117744), United States of America v. Estrada-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00227-118167), United States of America v. Evans (okwd-5:2022-mj-00341), United States of America v. Falany (okwd-5:2022-mj-00038), United States of America v. Felty (okwd-5:2022-mj-00166), United States of America v. Fenstermacher (okwd-5:2022-mj-00167), United States of America v. Ferreris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00459-119771), United States of America v. Ferreris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00459-119770), United States of America v. Fierro-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00017-116516), United States of America v. Figueroa (okwd-5:2022-cr-00140-117599), United States of America v. Figueroa (okwd-5:2022-mj-00242), United States of America v. Figueroa-Cifuentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00401-119492), United States of America v. Finto (okwd-5:2022-mj-00094), United States of America v. Finto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00071-116970), United States of America v. Flores (okwd-5:2022-mj-00056), United States of America v. Flores et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00066-116956), United States of America v. Flores et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00066-116957), United States of America v. Flores-Guerrero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00055-116800), United States of America v. Fonseca (okwd-5:2022-cr-00132-117539), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00009-116376), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00443-119781), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00187), United States of America v. Foster (okwd-5:2022-cr-00387-119311), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00366-119299), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00422), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00479), United States of America v. Fox (okwd-5:2022-mj-00197), United States of America v. Fraire-Aldaba (okwd-5:2022-mj-00089), United States of America v. Fraire-Aldaba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00085-117072), United States of America v. Francois (okwd-5:2022-mj-00421), United States of America v. Franklin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00370-119302), United States of America v. Frederick (okwd-5:2022-cr-00110-117391), United States of America v. Gallardo-Carbajal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00290-118674), United States of America v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-mj-00429), United States of America v. Garcia-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00332-118992), United States of America v. Garrett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00489-120109), United States of America v. Garza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00215-118140), United States of America v. Gaskin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00286-118670), United States of America v. Gaxiola-Reynaga (okwd-5:2022-cr-00056-116794), United States of America v. Gaxiola-Reynaga (okwd-5:2022-cr-00056-116795), United States of America v. Geimausaddle (okwd-5:2022-cr-00439-119839), United States of America v. Gildon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00115-117401), United States of America v. Gill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00460-119844), United States of America v. Gillispie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00415-119603), United States of America v. Glaze (okwd-5:2022-cr-00425-119691), United States of America v. Glick (okwd-5:2022-mj-00188), United States of America v. Goins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00100-117304), United States of America v. Golden (okwd-5:2022-mj-00124), United States of America v. Goldsmith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00065-116948), United States of America v. Goleman (okwd-5:2022-mj-00423), United States of America v. Gomez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00424), United States of America v. Gomez-Nava (okwd-5:2022-cr-00070-116974), United States of America v. Gomez-Nava (okwd-5:2022-mj-00108), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00350), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00352), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00282), United States of America v. Gonzalez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00080-116927), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Franco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00363-119277), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-mj-00379), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00226-118209), United States of America v. Gottfried (okwd-5:2022-cr-00423-119689), United States of America v. Granados (okwd-5:2022-cr-00081-117034), United States of America v. Grant (okwd-5:2022-cr-00145-117545), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-cr-00384-119337), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00016), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00063), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00208), United States of America v. Green et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00033-116634), United States of America v. Green et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00033-116636), United States of America v. Gress (okwd-5:2022-cr-00479-119973), United States of America v. Griffith (okwd-5:2022-mj-00209), United States of America v. Griffitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00250-118371), United States of America v. Guardiola-Gamez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00162-117642), United States of America v. Guedea (okwd-5:2022-cr-00237-118277), United States of America v. Guffey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00185), United States of America v. Gutierrez-Angeles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00051-116818), United States of America v. Haitshan (okwd-5:2022-mj-00023), United States of America v. Hall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00444-119785), United States of America v. Hamilton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00314-118815), United States of America v. Hardimon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00327-118984), United States of America v. Harmon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00192-117931), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00381-119325), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00021-116493), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00021-116494), United States of America v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00328-118990), United States of America v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00114-117403), United States of America v. Harvey (okwd-5:2022-cr-00356-119076), United States of America v. Hebb (okwd-5:2022-mj-00461), United States of America v. Hedge et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00267-118511), United States of America v. Henderson et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00044), United States of America v. Hennings (okwd-5:2022-cr-00113-117429), United States of America v. Hennings (okwd-5:2022-mj-00133), United States of America v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00251-118352), United States of America v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00178), United States of America v. Hernandez et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00349), United States of America v. Hernandez-Alvarado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00147-117572), United States of America v. Hernandez-Campos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00020-116476), United States of America v. Hernandez-Contreras (okwd-5:2022-mj-00076), United States of America v. Herrera-Medina (okwd-5:2022-mj-00180), United States of America v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00189-117815), United States of America v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-mj-00116), United States of America v. Hilliard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00499-120238), United States of America v. Hinojosa-Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120091), United States of America v. Hocker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00424-119659), United States of America v. Holder (okwd-5:2022-cr-00141-117562), United States of America v. Holder (okwd-5:2022-mj-00268), United States of America v. Hollis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00077), United States of America v. Hooee (okwd-5:2022-mj-00169), United States of America v. Hooper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00165-117649), United States of America v. Hopper (okwd-5:2022-mj-00266), United States of America v. Horn (okwd-5:2022-mj-00425), United States of America v. House (okwd-5:2022-cr-00174-117722), United States of America v. Howard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00010-116390), United States of America v. Howland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00438-119777), United States of America v. Hubbard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00106-117419), United States of America v. Hull (okwd-5:2022-cr-00050-116792), United States of America v. Hull (okwd-5:2022-mj-00302), United States of America v. Hunt (okwd-5:2022-mj-00174), United States of America v. Hunt (okwd-5:2022-cr-00107-117385), United States of America v. Hurd (okwd-5:2022-cr-00109-117424), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-cr-00083-117080), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-mj-00201), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-cr-00083-117081), United States of America v. Idell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00447-119796), United States of America v. Isbill (okwd-5:2022-mj-00274), United States of America v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00419-119678), United States of America v. Jamison (okwd-5:2022-mj-00463), United States of America v. Jaramillo-Orozco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00285-118662), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00028-116565), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00369-119317), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00315), United States of America v. Jolliffe (okwd-5:2022-mj-00351), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00129-117462), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-mj-00450), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-mj-00304), United States of America v. Kassanavoid (okwd-5:2022-cr-00185-117764), United States of America v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00395-119450), United States of America v. Kennedy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00088-117109), United States of America v. Khan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00281-118576), United States of America v. Kidd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00006), United States of America v. Killough (okwd-5:2022-cr-00186-117786), United States of America v. King (okwd-5:2022-cr-00488-120115), United States of America v. King (okwd-5:2022-mj-00184), United States of America v. Lack (okwd-5:2022-cr-00336-118996), United States of America v. Lara (okwd-5:2022-cr-00464-119933), United States of America v. Laster (okwd-5:2022-cr-00046-116644), United States of America v. Law (okwd-5:2022-cr-00236-118216), United States of America v. Law (okwd-5:2022-cr-00236-118217), United States of America v. Leatherwood (okwd-5:2022-mj-00449), United States of America v. Lebron (okwd-5:2022-mj-00078), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00007), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00314), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00368-119284), United States of America v. Liles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00216-118211), United States of America v. Little (okwd-5:2022-mj-00444), United States of America v. Littlejohn (okwd-5:2022-mj-00161), United States of America v. Littlejohn (okwd-5:2022-cr-00102-117393), United States of America v. Loera-Macias (okwd-5:2022-cr-00480-119968), United States of America v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00440-119748), United States of America v. Longman (okwd-5:2022-cr-00151-117564), United States of America v. Longman (okwd-5:2022-mj-00247), United States of America v. Lopez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00420-119686), United States of America v. Lopez-Nava et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00221-118213), United States of America v. Lopez-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00304-118795), United States of America v. Lopez-Segura (okwd-5:2022-cr-00196-117942), United States of America v. Lopez-Segura (okwd-5:2022-mj-00325), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116343), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116344), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116345), United States of America v. Lozania-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00183), United States of America v. Lucas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00480), United States of America v. Lucas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00477), United States of America v. Luper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00096-117253), United States of America v. Lusio-Flores (okwd-5:2022-cr-00418-119638), United States of America v. Machado (okwd-5:2022-mj-00254), United States of America v. Machado-Soto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00484-120107), United States of America v. Macias-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00053-116808), United States of America v. Madala (okwd-5:2022-cr-00150-117582), United States of America v. Madden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00026-116412), United States of America v. Maese-Luna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00399-119473), United States of America v. Maese-Munoz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00054-116802), United States of America v. Maese-Munoz (okwd-5:2022-mj-00073), United States of America v. Mahan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00191-117933), United States of America v. Maher (okwd-5:2022-mj-00354), United States of America v. Maley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00435-119622), United States of America v. Maley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00435-119621), United States of America v. Mansel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00340), United States of America v. Marris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00197-117937), United States of America v. Marris (okwd-5:2022-mj-00323), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00361), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00230), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00223-118171), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00302-118709), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00137-117591), United States of America v. Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00199-117954), United States of America v. Martinez-Rincon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00052-116816), United States of America v. Martinie-Ontiveros (okwd-5:2022-cr-00245-118375), United States of America v. Mays (okwd-5:2022-mj-00008), United States of America v. Mays (okwd-5:2022-mj-00170), United States of America v. Mazariegos-Mencia (okwd-5:2022-mj-00495), United States of America v. McAlister (okwd-5:2022-mj-00462), United States of America v. McClain (okwd-5:2022-cr-00027-116414), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00032-116621), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00032-116622), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-mj-00019), United States of America v. McCullough (okwd-5:2022-cr-00293-118698), United States of America v. McDonald (okwd-5:2022-mj-00129), United States of America v. McDonald (okwd-5:2022-mj-00125), United States of America v. McGuire (okwd-5:2022-cr-00482-120103), United States of America v. McKay et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00015-116473), United States of America v. Mead (okwd-5:2022-mj-00305), United States of America v. Meadows (okwd-5:2022-mj-00004), United States of America v. Medina-Gamez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00224-118173), United States of America v. Medina-Gil (okwd-5:2022-cr-00487-120101), United States of America v. Mendez-Porto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00396-119490), United States of America v. Merit (okwd-5:2022-mj-00009), United States of America v. Mihelic (okwd-5:2022-mj-00026), United States of America v. Miles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00105-117380), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-mj-00355), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-cr-00073-116954), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-cr-00003-116328), United States of America v. Miller et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00218-118184), United States of America v. Mireles-Moreno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00400-119483), United States of America v. Mitchell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00202), United States of America v. Mitchell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00322-118973), United States of America v. Modesto-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00238), United States of America v. Modesto-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00335-119031), United States of America v. Molina-Molina (okwd-5:2022-mj-00172), United States of America v. Molina-Molina (okwd-5:2022-cr-00090-117119), United States of America v. Montijo-Varela et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00465-119951), United States of America v. Monts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00329-118979), United States of America v. Moore (okwd-5:2022-cr-00171-117724), United States of America v. Moore (okwd-5:2022-mj-00037), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-mj-00103), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-cr-00069-116976), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-cr-00069-116977), United States of America v. Morales-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00242-118358), United States of America v. Morales-Mata (okwd-5:2022-cr-00279-118493), United States of America v. Morales-Mata (okwd-5:2022-mj-00382), United States of America v. Moreno et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00404-119468), United States of America v. Morris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00175-117712), United States of America v. Morris (okwd-5:2022-mj-00027), United States of America v. Moseley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00116-117413), United States of America v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00347), United States of America v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00195-117944), United States of America v. Nava-Guerra (okwd-5:2022-mj-00374), United States of America v. Nelson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00010), United States of America v. Nelson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00324-118977), United States of America v. Nguyen (okwd-5:2022-mj-00460), United States of America v. Nichols (okwd-5:2022-cr-00103-117431), United States of America v. Northcutt (okwd-5:2022-cr-00098-117213), United States of America v. Ochoa-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00472-119927), United States of America v. Ochoa-Santos et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00049-116798), United States of America v. Ochoa-Santos et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00049-116796), United States of America v. Olmedo-Acevedo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00497-120181), United States of America v. Ontiveros-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00101-117405), United States of America v. Ontiveros-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00163), United States of America v. Orellana (okwd-5:2022-cr-00019-116508), United States of America v. Orellana (okwd-5:2022-cr-00019-116509), United States of America v. Ortiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00321-119058), United States of America v. Ortiz-Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00397-119479), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00217-118193), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-mj-00496), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00405-119464), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00308-118813), United States of America v. Outland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00385-119323), United States of America v. Owens (okwd-5:2022-cr-00273-118501), United States of America v. Padilla-Chairez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00289-118684), United States of America v. Palma-Castellanos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00483-120089), United States of America v. Patino-Delgado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00089-117111), United States of America v. Paulick (okwd-5:2022-cr-00144-117568), United States of America v. Pennington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00022-116478), United States of America v. Perdomo (okwd-5:2022-mj-00090), United States of America v. Perez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00064-117069), United States of America v. Perez-Barrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00359-119165), United States of America v. Perez-Lopez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00270-118525), United States of America v. Perez-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00498-120055), United States of America v. Perez-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00173-117738), United States of America v. Perez-Torres (okwd-5:2022-mj-00285), United States of America v. Peterson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00139), United States of America v. Peuplie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00437-119702), United States of America v. Pihl (okwd-5:2022-mj-00203), United States of America v. Ping Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00225), United States of America v. Pitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00104-117359), United States of America v. Plummer et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00247-118366), United States of America v. Polite (okwd-5:2022-cr-00249-118373), United States of America v. Polly (okwd-5:2022-cr-00383-119309), United States of America v. Ponce Vargas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00136-117566), United States of America v. Ponce Vargas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00240), United States of America v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00166-117647), United States of America v. Porter et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00034), United States of America v. Powell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00382-119339), United States of America v. Puentas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00467), United States of America v. Puentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00337-119000), United States of America v. Purkey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00057), United States of America v. Quijivix et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00384), United States of America v. Ramirez-Castaneda (okwd-5:2022-cr-00244-118384), United States of America v. Rangel-Melendez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00397), United States of America v. Rangel-Melendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00238-118302), United States of America v. Rasberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00214-117880), United States of America v. Ray (okwd-5:2022-cr-00072-116986), United States of America v. Rayford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00381), United States of America v. Red Elk (okwd-5:2022-mj-00306), United States of America v. Redd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00430), United States of America v. Redd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00267), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116617), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116616), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00017), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116618), United States of America v. Rendon-Fraire (okwd-5:2022-cr-00470-119954), United States of America v. Resendiz-Olguin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00475), United States of America v. Reves (okwd-5:2022-mj-00321), United States of America v. Reyes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00127-117342), United States of America v. Ritchie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00392-119441), United States of America v. Rivera (okwd-5:2022-mj-00419), United States of America v. Robinson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00043-116695), United States of America v. Robledo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00041-116603), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00353-118957), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00243-118360), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00437), United States of America v. Rocha De Lucena (okwd-5:2022-mj-00168), United States of America v. Rodas-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00269-118507), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00457), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00320-118775), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00426), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00422-119661), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00320-118774), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00262-118396), United States of America v. Rodriguez Ortega et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00085), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-mj-00415), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00282-118581), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00282-118582), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Cruz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00469-119931), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Herrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00288-118676), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Herrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00099-117312), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00313-118797), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-mj-00358), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-mj-00173), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-cr-00135-117584), United States of America v. Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00014), United States of America v. Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00312), United States of America v. Rojo Alvarado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00307-118807), United States of America v. Romero-Mendoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00468-119929), United States of America v. Ross (okwd-5:2022-mj-00079), United States of America v. Ruelas-Pena (okwd-5:2022-cr-00118-117397), United States of America v. Ruelas-Pena (okwd-5:2022-mj-00162), United States of America v. Ruiz et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00291-118695), United States of America v. Sandefur (okwd-5:2022-mj-00126), United States of America v. Sapcut (okwd-5:2022-mj-00105), United States of America v. Sapcut (okwd-5:2022-cr-00091-117123), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00190), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00404), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00405), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00080), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00177), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00192), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00364), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00385), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00143), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00489), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00112), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00249), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00199), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00339), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00370), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00198), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00371), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00375), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00191), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00335), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00394), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00403), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00043), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00104), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00226), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00338), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00109), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00248), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00332), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00373), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00439), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00070), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00101), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00114), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00406), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00497), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00311), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00487), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00111), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00140), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00333), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00491), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00369), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00102), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00115), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00144), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00147), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00336), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00042), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00492), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00122), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00337), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00176), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00222), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00410), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00040), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00250), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00440), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00389), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00451), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00365), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00368), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00372), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00402), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00409), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00098), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00407), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00041), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00075), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00408), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00486), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00039), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00050), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00074), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00069), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00113), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00488), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00490), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00158), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00265), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00141), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00148), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00367), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00100), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00366), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00088), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00099), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00193), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00334), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00046), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00346), United States of America v. Segundo-Pacheco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00402-119486), United States of America v. Shannon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00128-117433), United States of America v. Shaputis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00474-119935), United States of America v. Shaw (okwd-5:2022-cr-00013-116498), United States of America v. Shaw (okwd-5:2022-cr-00013-116497), United States of America v. Shepherd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00307), United States of America v. Shockey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00142), United States of America v. Simmons (okwd-5:2022-mj-00127), United States of America v. Simpson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00139-117593), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-mj-00442), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00283-118737), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00272-118505), United States of America v. Solis-Mancilla (okwd-5:2022-mj-00428), United States of America v. South (okwd-5:2022-cr-00131-117597), United States of America v. Speal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00130-117492), United States of America v. Spikes (okwd-5:2022-mj-00356), United States of America v. Stark (okwd-5:2022-cr-00220-118178), United States of America v. Stephens (okwd-5:2022-cr-00310-118811), United States of America v. Stilley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00357-119092), United States of America v. Stinnett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00458-119772), United States of America v. Strange (okwd-5:2022-mj-00132), United States of America v. Stutson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00331-118986), United States of America v. Surber (okwd-5:2022-cr-00042-116610), United States of America v. Sutherland (okwd-5:2022-mj-00316), United States of America v. Tagle (okwd-5:2022-mj-00060), United States of America v. Tenpenny (okwd-5:2022-cr-00029-116555), United States of America v. Tevelan-Ajanel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00273), United States of America v. Thomas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00016-116502), United States of America v. Thomas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00016-116503), United States of America v. Thompson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00062), United States of America v. Tiger (okwd-5:2022-cr-00481-120057), United States of America v. Tolliver (okwd-5:2022-cr-00315-118823), United States of America v. Torres-Cervantes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00018-116491), United States of America v. Trizon-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00134-117541), United States of America v. Trizon-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00210), United States of America v. Tucker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00354-119171), United States of America v. Urias (okwd-5:2022-mj-00318), United States of America v. Urias et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00241), United States of America v. Utley (okwd-5:2022-mj-00494), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00097), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00067-116980), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00067-116981), United States of America v. Valdez Silva (okwd-5:2022-mj-00028), United States of America v. Valentin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00436-119633), United States of America v. Valle (okwd-5:2022-cr-00352-118954), United States of America v. Vargas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00246-118354), United States of America v. Vargas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00149-117551), United States of America v. Vargas et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00401), United States of America v. Vasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00036-116632), United States of America v. Venegas-Reyes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00012-116495), United States of America v. Walker (okwd-5:2022-mj-00061), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-cr-00394-119462), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-mj-00464), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-mj-00204), United States of America v. Warden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00228-118169), United States of America v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00421-119640), United States of America v. Washington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00446-119787), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00428-119669), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00466-119960), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00325-118981), United States of America v. Watson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00281), United States of America v. Webb (okwd-5:2022-cr-00323-118975), United States of America v. Wemyss (okwd-5:2022-mj-00065), United States of America v. West (okwd-5:2022-cr-00403-119488), United States of America v. Wetzel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00357), United States of America v. Wheeler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00014-116500), United States of America v. Wheeler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00014-116499), United States of America v. Widner (okwd-5:2022-mj-00234), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00008-116366), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00170-117730), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00045-116683), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00448-119821), United States of America v. Willis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00108-117387), United States of America v. Wolf (okwd-5:2022-mj-00308), United States of America v. Wolfe (okwd-5:2022-mj-00128), United States of America v. Wood (okwd-5:2022-cr-00463-119944), United States of America v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00367-119279), United States of America v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-mj-00068), United States of America v. Young (okwd-5:2022-cr-00492-120099), United States of America v. Zuniga-Magdaleno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00048-116674), United States of America v. Zuniga-Magdaleno (okwd-5:2022-mj-00045).