[CDATA[> Content should reflect new discoveries or approaches, and should not overlap with publications presented elsewhere by the authors. Geology: https://geology.msubmit.net Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Apprehensive-Ad6206 5 mo. Nature editors will normally honour requests that a paper not be sent to one or two (but no more) competing groups for review. Decisions are reversed. [CDATA[// >How to submit a manuscript Common Rejection Reasons | Authors All of these points are covered in the Writing a Journal Manuscript and the Writing in English tutorials. Each review is due in ten days, and many of them do arrive in two weeks. Geosphere: geosphere@geosociety.org. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Remember if your manuscript is sent for a second round of peer review the reviewers will see this letter too. We are a world leading research, educational and professional publisher. The decision is sent to the author. Decision sent to author->Waiting for revision . Clearly explain why you disagree with the decision and provide any new information that you would like the editors to take into consideration. After the paper passes the quality check, it is assigned to a Science Editor. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. Information for other options are available on our Springer Nature Transfer Desk page. Plants) Geology: geology@geosociety.org The paper will be returned to you to fix if it does not include a cover letter, continuous line numbers, double spaced text, captions for figures and tables, all required files, or clearly legible figures. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. //-->Editorial Process & Peer Review | Nature Plants Critical review determines the suitability and originality of the paper and the adequacy and conciseness of the presentation. Generally, only one letter defending your submission will be accepted for each of the review stages (editorial review and peer review). 201451 XXXXX@nature.com Final decision for XXXXX. We consider a variety of factors when making a decision at this stageit's not simply a tally of positive and negative reviews. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. Decision sent to author NZip for reviewers All peer-reviewed content will carry an anonymous statement of peer reviewer acknowledgement, and for those reviewers who give their consent, we will publish their names alongside the published article. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. Naturepapers are assigned to a print issue two weeks before publication, at which time authors will receive an e-mail notifying them of their scheduled print publication date. *Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Does "Decision Sent to Author " before the peer review stage - Reddit Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. Edit and Manage Your Decision Sent to Author Reject Online | pdfFiller We hope that with this tutorial you have a clearer idea of the best ways to prepare your manuscript for submission and craft an efficient and effective submission plan! English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. The authors will be sent the comments of the reviewers and Editor and asked to revise accordingly. Other ready to use document templates Claim Insert Sentence Go to page NOTE: The review process can take anywhere from one to four months, depending on the availability of reviewers and their timeliness in returning reviews. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. Yes var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. You have now completed the learning part of the tutorial, and so we recommend that you take the quiz to consolidate your learning. Nature Plants (Nat. //--> contracts here, report original scientific research (the main results and conclusions must not have been published or submitted elsewhere). Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Resubmission pending. Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. Include a point-by-point response to any reviewer comments. 2002 The Peer Review Process | Wiley Your manuscript can be rejected for many reasons but these can generally be divided into technical and editorial reasons. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Reject: This is an outright rejection decision, and in most cases, the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the author makes major revisions. If you are unable to access the site, please contact the journal editorial office at Not sure what the right forum is for this. This is known as a rescinding. Provide a polite and scholarly rebuttal to any points or comments you disagree with. 2017-07-13 11:21. A desk rejection, particularly at a journal like nature where there are a lot of submission, can definitely take more than a week. As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. Archived post. I think the manuscript "under consideration" is an auto-update that appears as soon as an editor has been assigned. Appeals must be rational arguments not emotional ones so be sure you have enough evidence before trying to change the editors mind. [CDATA[// >